Civic-EG.com Forum 3.3.1

- Mon May 18, 2009 4:22 pm #117577 is there a dif in how they feel, is one more dependable than tha otha??? just lukin for a lil info on tha diff between em

THE_n

[teal_dx]

- Mon May 18, 2009 4:30 pm #117581 hydro is for our cars, cable for earlier cars (pre 92 civics). The clutch pedal is a little softer with hydraulic setup. To put a cable tranny in 92+ civic is a step backward, but they make kits to do it...
You never have to worry about adjusting a hydraulic setup.

Do Not PM me your technical questions. Post them in the forum!
My 1992 SOHC Turbo Hatch
My Youtube Channel: 6th Gear Garage

- Mon May 18, 2009 5:28 pm #117590 ok thanks, i got all excited cuz it ws a si tranny nd came wit lsd, bt neva realized dat it wus cable

THE_n

- Mon May 18, 2009 6:03 pm #117593 The cable trannies are geared different. Not as aggressive as hydro trannies. The hydro. Ones are also stronger. They have better main bearings.

1986 Nissan 300zx
1980 Kawasaki KZ650
2014 Kawasaki Ninja 300