![Image](http://lh4.ggpht.com/_9Cem84tk9j0/S-GUqQkxEYI/AAAAAAAAAjQ/lW-epUfhw4g/Untitled-1%20copy.jpg)
Remember when Civics were cool ? Yea me neither
A forum dedicated to the 1992-1995 Honda Civic.
Gorveatt wrote:I'm still not with you on this, i've gone through two sets of tires in two summers(on in April, off in October), if you look at them from the outer side, they look fine, put on full lock and look at the inside, and wires are showing, i use to be able to have a set of tires for years on any of my past cars, but next year will be my third set in three summers... I am getting a camber kit this wo fix this issue,
Greasedmonkey wrote:Camber doesnt wear out tires as fast as you think. Ive done alignments for quite a while.
They are not needed.
I know they help. they were designed to adjust the camber on a car that didnt have the ability. Getting them is indeed personal preference, but that still doesnt change the fact that you do not need them.
That was with -3* front camber. Funny how they are evenly worn.
hkspowers wrote:Hell yeah man, I'm glad you said this also, I always thought you needed it, and I believed it so much that I actually had the idea in my head that people that did not have a camber kit and were lowered were doing it the ghetto way. Also this saves a shit ton of money as you mentioned earlier.
Thanks a million
scrape n pavement wrote:Greasedmonkey wrote:Camber doesnt wear out tires as fast as you think. Ive done alignments for quite a while.
They are not needed.
I know they help. they were designed to adjust the camber on a car that didnt have the ability. Getting them is indeed personal preference, but that still doesnt change the fact that you do not need them.
That was with -3* front camber. Funny how they are evenly worn.
How much highway driving were u doing?
Ben Sinkinson wrote:hkspowers wrote:Hell yeah man, I'm glad you said this also, I always thought you needed it, and I believed it so much that I actually had the idea in my head that people that did not have a camber kit and were lowered were doing it the ghetto way. Also this saves a shit ton of money as you mentioned earlier.
Thanks a million
totally agree with you, i believed it was impossible to adjust camber without the kits, surely theirs a fair bit of false advertising taking place as on most sights you MUST get these kits when a car has been lowered...?
hondamonstercrew wrote:i slammed the front end of my eg hatch and had this same issue definately passing this post on to a few mates that have tryed telling me i needed a camber kit i just got toe done and course mates being mates didnt believe me nice one man good read too
#ROBIN# wrote:can someone please explain to me why my left hand side front wheel has more negative camber than my right hand side (drivers side) ... this is the reason why i want to fit camber kit and for track...
i checked all bushings, checked the suspension thoroughly and they say its a common problem..is it?
Thank you in Advance
EH2_andy wrote:#ROBIN# wrote:can someone please explain to me why my left hand side front wheel has more negative camber than my right hand side (drivers side) ... this is the reason why i want to fit camber kit and for track...
i checked all bushings, checked the suspension thoroughly and they say its a common problem..is it?
Thank you in Advance
i'm in the same boat