Only Thing thats R whit ma eg,
Is the Rust
Type-R :-P
Is the Rust
Type-R :-P
- Wed Mar 25, 2009 2:21 pm
#105628
Some 1 year Old Pictures of my Eg
- Wed Apr 01, 2009 11:00 pm
#107483
Nice looking hatch got any engine pics
- Thu Apr 02, 2009 2:34 am
#107536
x2
you just made my day...
boosted94 wrote:Im thinking that if he was conserned enough about aerodynamics to add canards he would take that dam vertical sheet of plywood off his hatch.
BYS wing = FAIL
x2
you just made my day...
Last edited by GSRSI on Thu Apr 02, 2009 4:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
"do your own thing to stand out... but dont be a noob n be ricerish!
- Thu Apr 02, 2009 3:10 am
#107543
(shakes head) bys is functional!!!!!!! just like the canards
boosted94 wrote:Im thinking that if he was conserned enough about aerodynamics to add canards he would take that dam vertical sheet of plywood off his hatch.
BYS wing = FAIL
(shakes head) bys is functional!!!!!!! just like the canards
- Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:03 pm
#108020
Is it now? Got an aerodynamic performance test to prove it?
Why the hell would you want to stick the back end down on FRONT WHEEL DRIVE car in the first place?
blockustomz wrote:(shakes head) bys is functional!!!!!!! just like the canards
Is it now? Got an aerodynamic performance test to prove it?
Why the hell would you want to stick the back end down on FRONT WHEEL DRIVE car in the first place?
- Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:18 pm
#108021
There maybe more pictures?
colpitts wrote:
just.. wow. I dont like BYS at all, but this car is just too gorgeous.
There maybe more pictures?
- Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:24 pm
#108022
Maybe you haven't driven your car that fast yet, i.e when cornering at speeds over 200km/h you want som downforce on the rear of the car so it won´t come loose and end up in the morgue/scrapyard.
The bys wing creates to much drag in relations to downforce. Go with spoon och J´s wing instead if you want function instead of styling.
zeppelin101 wrote:blockustomz wrote:(shakes head) bys is functional!!!!!!! just like the canards
Is it now? Got an aerodynamic performance test to prove it?
Why the hell would you want to stick the back end down on FRONT WHEEL DRIVE car in the first place?
Maybe you haven't driven your car that fast yet, i.e when cornering at speeds over 200km/h you want som downforce on the rear of the car so it won´t come loose and end up in the morgue/scrapyard.
The bys wing creates to much drag in relations to downforce. Go with spoon och J´s wing instead if you want function instead of styling.
Best Regards, Johan
- Fri Apr 03, 2009 12:44 pm
#108027
Great post!
Mordiiax wrote:
Maybe you haven't driven your car that fast yet, i.e when cornering at speeds over 200km/h you want som downforce on the rear of the car so it won´t come loose and end up in the morgue/scrapyard.
The bys wing creates to much drag in relations to downforce. Go with spoon och J´s wing instead if you want function instead of styling.
Great post!
- Fri Apr 03, 2009 1:41 pm
#108042
Uh huh.
In which case if you're going to discuss the fine point of aerodynamics then people should be considering a fully functional front splitter and canards that are set up correctly. If you JUST stick the back end down you'll get even more understeer. That just isn't an option, the chassis has too much forward bias as it is.
The point is moot as I bet the majority of people on here will lower a car without considering its effect on roll centre which becomes more pronounced the higher the speeds. Or camber migration, and a proper static alignment for the sort of driving you do. Of course camber migration with a double wishbone suspension is vastly reduced compared to a McPherson strut where you have more suspension travel and less control over the suspension movement as it is inherently less 'rigid'.
Basically:
BYS spoiler is pointless. In every way. And to bring aero into it assumes you actually give a crap about the whole package which none but the track brigade really care about.
Mordiiax wrote:Maybe you haven't driven your car that fast yet, i.e when cornering at speeds over 200km/h you want som downforce on the rear of the car so it won´t come loose and end up in the morgue/scrapyard.
The bys wing creates to much drag in relations to downforce. Go with spoon och J´s wing instead if you want function instead of styling.
Uh huh.
In which case if you're going to discuss the fine point of aerodynamics then people should be considering a fully functional front splitter and canards that are set up correctly. If you JUST stick the back end down you'll get even more understeer. That just isn't an option, the chassis has too much forward bias as it is.
The point is moot as I bet the majority of people on here will lower a car without considering its effect on roll centre which becomes more pronounced the higher the speeds. Or camber migration, and a proper static alignment for the sort of driving you do. Of course camber migration with a double wishbone suspension is vastly reduced compared to a McPherson strut where you have more suspension travel and less control over the suspension movement as it is inherently less 'rigid'.
Basically:
BYS spoiler is pointless. In every way. And to bring aero into it assumes you actually give a crap about the whole package which none but the track brigade really care about.